[ Home / * / RSS ] [ b / c / g / lit / guestbook ] [ k / a / min / t / m ] [ Deepswarm / Services ] [ Search / Rules / Mod ]

/m/ - Monologue

ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν.
Miscellaneous fragmental writings, self-dialogues, and rantings.
[Return][Go to bottom]
Name (Name could be empty, then a random name will be used from a pool.)
Options
(sage: append your comment to a thread without bumping it; noko: after commenting, make your url stay inside the thread.)
Subject
Comment
File
Ext: jpg|jpeg|png|txt|conf|org|md|pdf|epub, Media:mp3|flac|webm; Max Size: 12M (Sum of all files);
Embed

Markup Guide

  • heading: use ## as 2nd heading and ### as 3rd.
  • inline code, use `
  • strong text, use **
  • italic text, use * or _ (single underscore)
  • slash the text, use ~~
  • underline the text, use __, enclosing text in double underscores.
  • Make hyperlink, directly paste url or use markdown syntax: [Link name](the url)
  • Goth the text, use [[ and ]]; Garamond the text, use (( and ))
  • Spolier the text, use ==; Make the text glowing, use ::
  • Make Kiketext, use ((( and )))
  • link inline meme/smiley, use double plus signs ++http://dswarmsikhttkg7jgsoyfiqpj3ighupfrvuz5ri3lu5q2dlqyrpgk7ad.onion/css/e/b0.webp++
  • code block, use ```:

    ```
    // comment
    some code
    ```

  • A place for testing markup: /test. I'll clean test threads from time to time, so use it when you're not sure.
  • Use >>NUM (double) to make reference in-board,
  • use >>>/SLUG/NUM (triple) to reference any post of any board.

     No.25

    This is truly spiritual:
    >the visions I saw I did not perceive in dreams, or sleep, or delirtum, or by the
    >eyes of the body, or by the ears of the outer self, or in hidden places; but I
    >received them while awake and seeing with a pure mind and the eyes and ears
    >of the inner self, in open places, as God willed it. How this might be is hard
    >for mortal flesh to understand.
    >Hildegard of Bingen

    "Spiritual life" is fake spiritual.
    Imagination is fake spiritual.

    Jung, Steiner, Bingen, Swedenborg are truly spiritual.
    Mozart, Beethoven, Xenakis, Novalis, most artists or poets are Spirit, they are not truly spiritual. They don't have visions.

    Truly spiritual is not necessarily really superior to anything else, but truly spiritual is truly spiritual. Truly spiritual is have the abilty to literally see visions. This is not imagination or Art. Don't confusing "spiritual" with Art, Music and Spirit.

     No.26

    >>25
    In the modern time, a thinker, an artist don't need to be truly spiritual to be a Spirit. Some truly spiritual persons are common in normies who don't read or write. They are not Spirit, but they are still truly spiritual. (Jung et al. who I referred to above as instances of truly spiritual are also Spirit and their Spirit aspect comes from their spiritual nature)

    This is the difference.

     No.27

    Music is essentially the creation of God and human. Human art has become the new nature, the nature in the world of idea.
    Music has already surpassed the sum of all spirituality. Then, the spirituality would suddenly consumed all the Music.
    Spritual is the prototype, is the history.
    Music is the becoming, is the future.
    God is living in the Music.