[ Home / * / RSS ] [ b / c / g / lit / guestbook ] [ k / a / min / t / m ] [ Deepswarm / Services ] [ Search / Rules / Mod ]

/b/ - Stochastic

"Alle Empfindungen stiegen bis zu einer niegekannten Höhe in ihm. Er durchlebte ein unendlich buntes Leben; starb und kam wieder, liebte bis zur höchsten Leidenschaft, und war dann wieder auf ewig von seiner Geliebten getrennt."
[Return][Go to bottom]
Name
 (Name could be empty, then a random name will be used from a pool.)
Options(sage: append your comment to a thread without bumping it; noko: after commenting, make your url stay inside the thread.)
Subject
Comment
File
Ext: jpg|jpeg|png|txt|conf|org|md|pdf|epub, Media:mp3|flac|webm; Max Size: 12M (Sum of all files);
Embed

Markup Guide

  • heading: use ## as 2nd heading and ### as 3rd.
  • inline code, use `
  • strong text, use **
  • italic text, use * or _ (single underscore)
  • slash the text, use ~~
  • underline the text, use __, enclosing text in double underscores.
  • Make hyperlink, directly paste url or use markdown syntax: [Link name](the url)
  • Goth the text, use [[ and ]]; Garamond the text, use (( and ))
  • Spolier the text, use ==; Make the text glowing, use ::
  • Make Kiketext, use ((( and )))
  • link inline meme/smiley, use double plus signs ++http://dswarmsikhttkg7jgsoyfiqpj3ighupfrvuz5ri3lu5q2dlqyrpgk7ad.onion/css/e/b0.webp++
  • code block, use ```:

    ```
    // comment
    some code
    ```

  • A place for testing markup: /test. I'll clean test threads from time to time, so use it when you're not sure.
  • Use >>NUM (double) to make reference in-board,
  • use >>>/SLUG/NUM (triple) to reference any post of any board.

     No.139

    Why they like to say, "You have completed me", or "Without you there is no me", or "By seeing you, I see myself", or "If I forget you, I lose myself" things like that… I guess they really like using this sort of sentences to express their love, devotion to lover, or devotion to the God, but apart from this decent reason, some really thought about themselves like this.
    Soberly, this Novalis-like thinking about love (not exactly) has never applied to me. I don't think any one person can make me whole or bring me closer to the God in union with them. Tbh It's a really common and religious idea, but its cringe to me. Even if we want to connect the self with God, there is no need to put a mirror (beloved) between them. There is no intermediary between oneself and God.
    Sometimes they think I am the purest of angels, sometimes they think I am the most evil of demons; they think I have messed up their lives, and they also think I have made them whole. Trash.
    In my case, my conclusion is always only this: they will only be my enemies. Precisely speaking everyone finally became my enemies, and regarding the ever exsited romantic relationship, it makes the resentment deeper.

     No.140

    Any works of art that I align to complete me. Bruegel's paintings complete me, an enormous number of compositions complete me. Bohor and so on definitely complete me, but artists or any individuals couldn't complete me in any sense.
    An individual's works could "complete" me but this individual cannot. If there is a work of art, of love, a result of love, then it might be possible to complete me in the sense of, art.