[ Home / * / RSS ] [ b / c / g / lit / guestbook ] [ k / a / min / t / m ] [ Deepswarm / Services ] [ Search / Rules / Mod ]

/b/ - Stochastic

"Alle Empfindungen stiegen bis zu einer niegekannten Höhe in ihm. Er durchlebte ein unendlich buntes Leben; starb und kam wieder, liebte bis zur höchsten Leidenschaft, und war dann wieder auf ewig von seiner Geliebten getrennt."
[Return][Go to bottom]
Name
(Name could be empty, then a random name will be used from a pool.)
Options(sage: append your comment to a thread without bumping it; noko: after commenting, make your url stay inside the thread.)
Subject
Comment
File
Ext: jpg|jpeg|png|txt|conf|org|md|pdf|epub, Media:mp3|flac|webm; Max Size: 12M (Sum of all files);
Embed

Markup Guide

  • heading: use ## as 2nd heading and ### as 3rd.
  • inline code, use `
  • strong text, use **
  • italic text, use * or _ (single underscore)
  • slash the text, use ~~
  • underline the text, use __, enclosing text in double underscores.
  • Make hyperlink, directly paste url or use markdown syntax: [Link name](the url)
  • Goth the text, use [[ and ]]; Garamond the text, use (( and ))
  • Spolier the text, use ==; Make the text glowing, use ::
  • Make Kiketext, use ((( and )))
  • link inline meme/smiley, use double plus signs ++http://dswarmsikhttkg7jgsoyfiqpj3ighupfrvuz5ri3lu5q2dlqyrpgk7ad.onion/css/e/b0.webp++
  • code block, use ```:

    ```
    // comment
    some code
    ```

  • A place for testing markup: /test. I'll clean test threads from time to time, so use it when you're not sure.
  • Use >>NUM (double) to make reference in-board,
  • use >>>/SLUG/NUM (triple) to reference any post of any board.

     No.63

    >>62
    Just wasted 12 Euro and found out that it is even broken THERE! Prestomusic!
    Need to submit a complaint.

     No.64

    >>63
    I don't even know a bit about how music industry operates, but now it seems like the files are directly provided by the label to these streaming services (maybe distributors? resellers?), and yes it only makes sense this way (silly me), so they're all effectively ruined.
    Is there a possibility that even the CDs are not devoid of problem? It's been 3yrs! Is it really that no one noticed before, or is it the case that no one issued any complaint? Maybe my order in prestomusic is the first one that has ever been made?
    LOL.

     No.65

    BTW I didn't mean to open a new thread, it's only after I've submitted and even replied that I found I forgot to really click the reply button. Sorry!

     No.66

    >>64
    >music industry
    I think these files are distributed by certain distribution companies like distrokid, for some small labels or independent musicians. Basically, labels would send files to them, and then those distributors will take care of the files. But they won't modify the files.
    For a major label like DG, they should have their own separate way of working with those streaming platforms. So it's highly likely that the glitch issue of track7 was really a problem with the original engineering file. I really don't know what happened to DG's pipeline that would cause such an error, and been unnoticed by everyone. It's safe to assume that this release hasn't even been reviewed by a master engineer who should check the whole release.
    I've never been in any music industry, but I think my guess is largely correct. Well, major labels are a mess. It's ridiculous, lol.

     No.67

    >>64
    Okay, I may have misunderstood something. If the track7 of your CD is really fine, then it's not the issue of original engineering file.

     No.68

    >>65
    I think I may need to really differentiate the css rules between reply mode and normal mode, lol.

     No.69

    >>67
    The orthodox chant, its CD is fine, but the track on the streaming service is ruined. So it should not be an engineering error. I don't really think it's possible that the problematic track in "Bach: Contrapunctus XI &Beethoven: Cello Sonata No. 1 & String Quartet Op. 132" is an engineering one. That's ridiculous.
    BTW the problematic album is not a DG album. It is AVI8553225, released by Avi Music: https://avi-music.de/index_e.html
    The album was released in 2011. Qobuz also got the metadata wrong. Think it's because of:
    >Deutsche Grammophon and CAvi-music announce strategic partnership across label & catalogue
    https://www.deutschegrammophon.com/en/projects/diverse-kuenstler/news/deutsche-grammophon-and-cavi-music-announce-strategic-partnership-across-label-catalogue-269236

     No.70

    File: 1712675297497.png (78.33 KB, 991x349,imageMagick.png)

    >>69
    Thanks for notice. This is so complicated. So I thought this is a DG album since the qobuz labeled it with DG, but the truth is its not only DG, but a collaboration of DG with CAvi. The cover really isn't DG's style. Don't quite understand exactly what work DG did in this case, as it seems like the mastering works should have been handled by Cavi.

     No.71

    >>70
    At least now:
    >The DIGITAL distribution (streaming/Donwload) is exclusively handled by
    >DEUTSCHE GRAMMOPHON GmbH, 10245 Berlin/Germany.
    https://avi-music.de/html/jakla_e.html

    Let me buy a physical copy and see what's happening. Pretty sure that there shouldn't be any problem with the physical version. DG now really becomes suspicious.

     No.72

    >>71
    Did prestoclassical respond to your complaint? Just found presto even has streaming service (with free trial). So I really think your order was the first one. lol

     No.73

    File: 1712821642133.jpeg (155.82 KB, 1192x1113,response.jpeg)

    >>72
    Yes they did.
    >We have also passed this on to our digital downloads department for investigation.
    LMAO