[ Home / * / RSS ] [ b / c / g / lit / guestbook ] [ k / a / min / t / m ] [ Deepswarm / Services ] [ Search / Rules / Mod ]

/m/ - Monologue

ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν.
Miscellaneous fragmental writings, self-dialogues, and rantings.
Name
(Name could be empty, then a random name will be used from a pool.)
Options(sage: append your comment to a thread without bumping it; noko: after commenting, make your url stay inside the thread.)
Subject
Comment
File
Ext: jpg|jpeg|png|txt|conf|org|md|pdf|epub, Media:mp3|flac|webm; Max Size: 12M (Sum of all files);
Embed

Markup Guide

  • heading: use ## as 2nd heading and ### as 3rd.
  • inline code, use `
  • strong text, use **
  • italic text, use * or _ (single underscore)
  • slash the text, use ~~
  • underline the text, use __, enclosing text in double underscores.
  • Make hyperlink, directly paste url or use markdown syntax: [Link name](the url)
  • Goth the text, use [[ and ]]; Garamond the text, use (( and ))
  • Spolier the text, use ==; Make the text glowing, use ::
  • Make Kiketext, use ((( and )))
  • link inline meme/smiley, use double plus signs ++http://dswarmsikhttkg7jgsoyfiqpj3ighupfrvuz5ri3lu5q2dlqyrpgk7ad.onion/css/e/b0.webp++
  • code block, use ```:

    ```
    // comment
    some code
    ```

  • A place for testing markup: /test. I'll clean test threads from time to time, so use it when you're not sure.
  • Use >>NUM (double) to make reference in-board,
  • use >>>/SLUG/NUM (triple) to reference any post of any board.

     No.67[Reply]

    .. would push thinking to the radiancy of feeling.

     No.68

    >The reduction to essence is reduction to the demonic, that is, to full depth of Good or to full depth of Evil, to the radiant source of light or to “the unbreakable core of night.” This is Schelling’s tragic vision of the universe, synthesized in his Freiheitsschrift(Researches on Freedom, 1809). We are torn between heaven and hell (Baader’s influence may be in play here as well). Consequently, the intermediate realm after death is still eventful—a crossing, a wandering—while purgatory as a place of punishment and waiting is abolished as such, at least until Schelling parts company with Swedenborg. Horn properly notes that Schelling relies on a single verse from Revelation (22:11)—“Let him who is filthy be filthy still, and him who is holy be holy still”—stiffly translated by Martin Luther as, “Whoever is wicked, let him remain so; whoever is pious, let him remain so.” In ef­fect, this is the echo of a verse from the Old Testament in which Schelling particularly delights: God is righteous in the right­eous, wicked in the wicked. A similar dichotomy can be found in Swedenborg and Schelling in the pairing of clairvoyance and madness.
    >https://swedenborg.com/scholars-swedenborgs-influence-on-german-idealism-and-mysticism/

     No.75

    The former is always ascending; the latter descending. Only one summits the highest peak of thought, deepest feeling also oozes within. A mysterious aurora then blooms.
    This explains one reason why feeling is reactive. It was born first and functions as a root, a basement.



     No.57[Reply]

    Soul is bloated, idea is not.
    Idea is autistic.
    Soul is bloated, knowledge is not.
    Knowledge is autistic.
    Symphony is bloated, solo instrumental is not.
    Solo instrumental is autistic.
    Goethean is bloated.
    Intuition is bloated.
    I choose idea and knowledge for the soul, the soul's life, while I'm living as soulean, symphonized, intuitionized and Goethean.
    3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

     No.61

    I guess: Dragons don't have knowledge beyond their "spiritual" existence - I would prefer to refer this existence as "soulean", spiritual animals' spirits (stemmed from actual gods, minor gods) are universal, however their souls are purer than human beings'.

     No.63

    >>59
    Living private life -> slave morality
    I reject intimacy.

     No.72

    >>61
    Regarding the battle happened in 1879 between the archangel Michael and ahrimanic powers - dragon,
    >The battle thus took place in the 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s and came to a conclusion in the autumn of 1879, when Michael and his followers won a victory over certain ahrimanic powers.
    >…
    >Losing the battle means they are no longer to be found in the heavens, to use the biblical term. Instead, they are to be found in the human realms, which means that the late 1870s were a particular time when human souls became subject to ahrimanic powers with regard to certain powers of cognition.
    >…
    >If you were to go back to very early times in evolution, you would find a battle similar to the one I have just described. As already mentioned, these battles have recurred over and over again, but always on different issues.
    >Steiner, GA177

     No.73

    >>72
    Then Plutarch,
    >Oromazes, born from the purest light, and Areimanius, born from the darkness, are constantly at war with each other; [370] and Oromazes created six gods, the first of Good Thought, the second of Truth, the third of Order, and, of the rest, one of Wisdom, one of Wealth, and one the Artificer of Pleasure in what is Honourable. But Areimanius created rivals, as it were, equal to these in number. Then Oromazes enlarged himself to thrice his former size, and removed himself as far distant from the Sun as the Sun is distant from the Earth, and adorned the heavens with stars. One star he set there before all others as a guardian and watchman, the Dog-star.
    >Moralia: Volume V, ISIS AND OSRIS, 47.

     No.74

    I should have put this thread in /t…



     No.71[Reply]

    Agreements come from misunderstandings. Disagreements are more welcomed, since disagreements bring two talking subjects closer to the relative truth, they may envisioned.
    Real correspondences come not from agreements, but faith, courage, restless persistence - effort, and virtue of nobility.
    Nobility - I guess, relates to: connections, dependent relations, restraint, influencing, covering, protection, security etc. A naked person would not be noble, nor would a completely solitary, lonely one.


     No.70[Reply]

    It is a situation in which all philosophy collapses and God disappears. I hated life to an extreme point. Sometimes I even wanted to give my life to others - utilized by others - because I didn't need it. Then, I gradually realized that all the resentment came from the presence of time, that this "life" was actually occupying time, and I couldn't really isolate this "life".
    In life, both misery, and happiness, function as torture.


     No.69[Reply]

    I started to have random auditory hallucination - true hallucinations thus not in my mind.


     No.65[Reply]

    Suicide is -
    a experience.

     No.66

    Any mountaineer who killed by the nature, is noble than anyone who killed himself in his room.
    The two cases are all essentially suicide, the former is even a more real and solid suicide.
    I find that several years ago I’ve came into this conclusion, and at that time i haven’t seriously thought about “nature”.



    File: 1748081468669.jpg (264.37 KB, 960x659,FrederickII.jpg)

     No.62[Reply]

    I value nobleness most.
    Nobleness - is certainly bloated.
    A main manifestation of nobleness is Haydn's Piano Concerto No.2,4 - intellectualistic Goethean.


     No.56[Reply]

    Spiritual suffering is easy,
    Spiritual thinking is hard;
    Physically suffering is hard as well.
    The hardest part is synthesizing each facets.


     No.52[Reply]

    An image of a thinker may not convey a clear temperament or tendency, yet it evokes a sense of “pain,” perhaps a “cheerful pain.” When someone genuinely shares their thoughts with others—always in the context of an individual-to-individual connection—there is often a background of pain present as well.

    But the very strange thing is, when someone thinks alone - this has nothing to do with sort of an image of a thinker just because our “thinker” here doesn’t able to or want to watch himself, he don’t even feel himself at that moment - this becomes the most joyful and profound feeling one can experience on earth. Truly. To say it more precise, when he recalls, he remembers that joyful, which is exactly born out of the ashes of the painful. This painful comes from all his past experiences, I mean, all, not even some specific experiences but all of them. The opposite status of “painful” seems absent and so unreal…
Pure thinking is what he goes through, where he always has “joyful and profound feeling” like a function links the process of this and the result of that. When experiences come in, or memories, that profound feeling of “thinking” looks like finds its source. Everything is being inserted in an endless circle.

    Experience just means some sort of dirty, filthy, things.


     No.49[Reply]

    I have had a very hard time to overcome all some of Xenakis' works. Sometimes I thought I'm not interested in the music of other composers at all, but this is such a desperate idea so I deadly wanted to suppress it. People often find things of interest, but in my ears I only have La légende d'Eer. It has always been like this. I think La légende d'Eer is far more important than Bohor, and these two together are the most important works in more than half a century. I want to know when this situation should end. This is strange, since before the great phenomenon of Xenakis' music was Romanticism / Beethoven…


    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
    | Catalog