[ Home / * / RSS ] [ b / c / g / lit / guestbook ] [ k / a / min / nat / t / m ] [ Deepswarm / Services ] [ Search / Rules / Log in ]

/m/ - Monologue

ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν.
Miscellaneous fragmental writings, self-dialogues, and rantings.

 No.69[Reply]

I started to have random auditory hallucination - true hallucinations thus not in my mind.


 No.65[Reply]

Suicide is -
a experience.

 No.66

Any mountaineer who killed by the nature, is noble than anyone who killed himself in his room.
The two cases are all essentially suicide, the former is even a more real and solid suicide.
I find that several years ago I’ve came into this conclusion, and at that time i haven’t seriously thought about “nature”.



File: 1748081468669.jpg (264.37 KB, 960x659,FrederickII.jpg)

 No.62[Reply]

I value nobleness most.
Nobleness - is certainly bloated.
A main manifestation of nobleness is Haydn's Piano Concerto No.2,4 - intellectualistic Goethean.


 No.56[Reply]

Spiritual suffering is easy,
Spiritual thinking is hard;
Physically suffering is hard as well.
The hardest part is synthesizing each facets.


 No.52[Reply]

An image of a thinker may not convey a clear temperament or tendency, yet it evokes a sense of “pain,” perhaps a “cheerful pain.” When someone genuinely shares their thoughts with others—always in the context of an individual-to-individual connection—there is often a background of pain present as well.

But the very strange thing is, when someone thinks alone - this has nothing to do with sort of an image of a thinker just because our “thinker” here doesn’t able to or want to watch himself, he don’t even feel himself at that moment - this becomes the most joyful and profound feeling one can experience on earth. Truly. To say it more precise, when he recalls, he remembers that joyful, which is exactly born out of the ashes of the painful. This painful comes from all his past experiences, I mean, all, not even some specific experiences but all of them. The opposite status of “painful” seems absent and so unreal…
Pure thinking is what he goes through, where he always has “joyful and profound feeling” like a function links the process of this and the result of that. When experiences come in, or memories, that profound feeling of “thinking” looks like finds its source. Everything is being inserted in an endless circle.

Experience just means some sort of dirty, filthy, things.


 No.49[Reply]

I have had a very hard time to overcome all some of Xenakis' works. Sometimes I thought I'm not interested in the music of other composers at all, but this is such a desperate idea so I deadly wanted to suppress it. People often find things of interest, but in my ears I only have La légende d'Eer. It has always been like this. I think La légende d'Eer is far more important than Bohor, and these two together are the most important works in more than half a century. I want to know when this situation should end. This is strange, since before the great phenomenon of Xenakis' music was Romanticism / Beethoven…


 No.47[Reply]

Knows nothing about music, when he divinely manifested himself, it was cringe: anomalous pop-music with phase shifting-like effects, echoic, and embryonic. He himself, miserable, reactive, blind. There was no light displayed, there was only sounds, and darkness.

 No.48

The water flows, the sounds come out. He displayed, like fingers flow around instruments, sounds were merely a result. He was unaware, unfeel. The name "Hades" hided deeply inside the coding scheme, of effects, like a geophone listens the ground, I listened Hades' heart, even it was a mirror. The source missed, and it needs to be find, to be converse, to be united, and to depart.



 No.43[Reply]

The art of life is the art of bloatology. It is Goethean, I am impressed.
It is sublime, it is beautiful, it is finally meaningful.
It is hard, it is ascetism.


 No.29[Reply]

Modern world's unrestrained praise of perception makes me feel extremly disgusted.
TOTALLY FUCKED.
The combo of perception + science.
The combo of perception + science.
The combo of perception + science.
Gosh this is really a result of Romantic-Goethean philosophy!
Real Poetry and Music have been truly forgotten!

 No.30

>>29
>result of Romantic-Goethean philosophy!
I mean the Romantic-Goethean philosophy has been trivially misunderstood by the mass… so this is the result.

 No.31

Likewise, degenerate successful normies being amazed by Nature, especially those particularly magnificent parts. Nature to them is objective rather than subjective, soydevs just couldn't understand this!
Perception-sensation is subjective to them rather than objective.

 No.36

>>29
The best integration mode of perceiving and thinking, is might be like this:
- Your perceiving is thinking; You think as if you perceive
- Your thinking is perceiving; You perceive as if you think

 No.42

>>36
A true poetry is both pure and impure.
You either live a pure life and write impure poetry, or, you live an impure life, and write pure poetry, hence to be completed, united.
This is very hard to be precisely concluded. Since "pure" itself have to be said of form or of content.

I am forcing myself to live an impure life, so the purity sense in poetry, can be meaningful.



 No.41[Reply]

Geir A. Jenssen.
YES.


[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
| Catalog