[ Home / * / RSS ] [ b / c / g / lit / guestbook ] [ k / a / min / t / m ] [ Deepswarm / Services ] [ Search / Rules / Mod ]

/b/ - Stochastic

"Alle Empfindungen stiegen bis zu einer niegekannten Höhe in ihm. Er durchlebte ein unendlich buntes Leben; starb und kam wieder, liebte bis zur höchsten Leidenschaft, und war dann wieder auf ewig von seiner Geliebten getrennt."
Name (Name could be empty, then a random name will be used from a pool.)
Options(sage: append your comment to a thread without bumping it; noko: after commenting, make your url stay inside the thread.)
Subject
Comment
File
Ext: jpg|jpeg|png|txt|conf|org|md|pdf|epub, Media:mp3|flac|webm; Max Size: 12M (Sum of all files);
Embed

Markup Guide

  • heading: use ## as 2nd heading and ### as 3rd.
  • inline code, use `
  • strong text, use **
  • italic text, use * or _ (single underscore)
  • slash the text, use ~~
  • underline the text, use __, enclosing text in double underscores.
  • Make hyperlink, directly paste url or use markdown syntax: [Link name](the url)
  • Goth the text, use [[ and ]]; Garamond the text, use (( and ))
  • Spolier the text, use ==; Make the text glowing, use ::
  • Make Kiketext, use ((( and )))
  • link inline meme/smiley, use double plus signs ++http://dswarmsikhttkg7jgsoyfiqpj3ighupfrvuz5ri3lu5q2dlqyrpgk7ad.onion/css/e/b0.webp++
  • code block, use ```:

    ```
    // comment
    some code
    ```

  • A place for testing markup: /test. I'll clean test threads from time to time, so use it when you're not sure.
  • Use >>NUM (double) to make reference in-board,
  • use >>>/SLUG/NUM (triple) to reference any post of any board.

    File: 1758105446451.png (76.54 KB, 1018x281,codeberg.png)

     No.324[Reply]

    The first came to my mind is Codeberg e.V..
    And codeberg.org is perfect.

     No.323[Reply]

    在身处逆境时喜欢自嘲和开玩笑的人认为自己是通透的——假如这人已经经历过青年时期的痛苦，他会觉得自己更加通透了，反正痛苦只不过是个普遍事物而已——但是有另一个更加负责任的选择，就是把这经历隐藏起来，向内反复思考。
    在身处逆境时喜欢自嘲和开玩笑的人是不负责任的、自私的，炫耀自己的逆境和心境以逼迫自己不反思整个处境和跟世界的关系。

    File: 1756780437886.png (7.71 KB, 360x90,logo_text_slide_frame.png)

     No.322[Reply]

    > A static site generator for video publishing.
    I like the devs, they also build faircamp etc.
    I just uploaded a short video, but the process was a hassle because I was doing it on my laptop. May not update it actively, so i'll just leave it here: https://videos.deep-swarm.xyz/Music/

     No.319[Reply]

    1. 占卜工具（18世纪后用来 Cartomancy 的塔罗牌，或用来 Bibliomancy 的书，等等）和占卜工具上的图案或内容的排列，对结果准确度的贡献似乎都在心灵意志之后：心灵意志（人） -> [应用]随机抽牌（自然） -> [使用]现成的占卜工具（世界的艺术对象）
    2. 任何塔罗牌自有一套规则：抽牌的人只要遵循这个规则，心灵意志就根据这个规则和“答案”再经过随机定律选择了某个特定的“象”，这样人就选择到了答案
    3. 就塔罗牌设计来说，被认为能测得更“准”的塔罗牌，它的牌面设计可能更符合日常事件运行的组合
    4. 这个心灵能看见最准确的那个答案

     No.320

    我的想法是，假如我现在记住一套与主流占卜理论相反的对应，比如认为，蛇：直接的，愚人：智慧的，让这个原型体系完整，然后再经过一段时间去抽牌。心灵看到“直接”的答案时候，人就会抽到蛇的牌。


     No.315[Reply]

    My server provider frantech physically migrated their servers to Swizterland few days ago - resulting in 3–4 days of downtime - but still now I find the slack storage block attached to my server has connection issues.

     No.245[Reply]

    日本文化是我见过的欧亚文化中所出现过的最让我反感的东西，不仅仅是反感现代的日本动漫和那些文盲精日，还有一些更传统体面的，包括茶道茶具文化。任何年轻人或者中年人，只要是中了“高贵”日本文化的邪，妥妥的奴隶道德持有者。
    我小时候喜欢看寺山修司，当然地下音乐也是必修课，看铃木清顺，但过了那几年，我认为我再也不会返回去去对这些感兴趣。当我阅读意大利人写的宗教长青哲学书籍时，里面时不时会提到日本文化的一些概念，我会感到一头雾水，因为我根本就不觉得日本的任何看似是“思想性“的东西跟我所关心的那些东西有真正的联系。我对佛教了解甚少，但是佛教文化所延伸出来的”茶道文化“一直令我恶心无比。现在四处都是那种白天徒步钓鱼晚上品茶做精神日本人的低级虚无佬，老婆也清一色文盲，人均管他们的钱+母老虎这种配置（男的假文艺吸引了文盲女：双向奔赴），有时候偶尔跟他们打个交道（一般是买东西，比如我最近买了茶筅，只是为了做抹茶拿铁用）他们恨不得把自己的尊严自己的ego秀你一脸。
    日本的登山品牌montbell做的最蠢，不小心碰一下我脑子里就长满了那种封闭家庭民族的优越感和莫名其妙的道德清高感的画面，那些搞户外咖啡搞装逼露营的美式日式复古男女就是从崇拜这些开始的，muji montbell etc. 的衣服设计非常虚伪，如果可以用虚伪这个词去形容服装设计，那就形容日本人所做的所有日本品牌的服装，肩部邋遢，袖子短，也绝对不会给你设计好什么肩缝，全部落肩处理，因为他们觉得真时髦，禅味十足，就差没说自己是“户外潮牌”了。我想过上一千年也别指望日本人会想到像始祖鸟那样做衣服，还function is beauty, 没看到function到底在哪，也没觉得beauty。。。
    日本的餐具风格最流行也看似最高级的是那种不对称的“手捏”感，还有什么手工锤纹，有时候看到那种餐具器具我真觉得我被侮辱了审美。我感觉我看到泥人在我眼前炫耀自己交配的姿势，就这样。
    日本的哲学就不用说了，从左翼到右翼到民族主义，到无政府，到现代，无一不是废物。跟海德格尔对过话的那个人势利地就差跪下来了（日本民族管这叫什么真诚）
    日本的haiku就更是笑掉大牙了，完全是假到不能再假的诗歌的代表，有些老中乐队还觉得haiku这个词特edgy做自己专辑名什么的，专辑内容就是抽烟喝酒日逼迷幻-“尊严”自我，跟日本精神确实一脉相承。
    我认为我除了未来可能会研究到禅宗-天台宗这类的中日宗教，应该不会光顾日本文化的任何方面了。不逛那些精日欧洲user的论坛也是这个原因，还spiritual呢，你跟我说你们在一个丑到不能再丑的日本风格imageboard上跟别的人聊“不能欣赏日本文化日本电影日本动漫的人是normie”时我真不知道spiritual这个词到底啥意思了。废物adhd intp/infp左派们求你们别再装模作样拿gnu/linux装逼拿日本文化充自己有文化有品味，我知道你们干什么都是为了交配，当你们说什么禁止"hate speech"禁止"反LGBTQ+"的时候，我寻思我要消灭的不就是这种人吗？就是反对你们啊。
    19 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

     No.266

    >>265
    It is not as simple as "people don't actually live like that anymore" and I've never used any big words. Here what is at stake is rather than a way of living and the socio-technological condition, the concept of human being, and what constitutes human soul, the nature of human agency, and what's the point of life, etc. You may look at the outward manifestation of a metaphysical change and deem the outward manifestation as what's crucial, and be a scientific materialist at heart while denying the fact, of course.
    The transformation that happened was, while salvation or perfection or whatever was an act of ascending a hierarchy by means of conforming to the natural rhythm of the cosmos prior to the second axial age, after that it became genuinely transcendental, hence meaning and purpose of life and goodness etc. all decoupled from the natural order, etc. So at the end of the day you really didn't understand what I meant.

     No.267

    >>266
    When we are talking about what is good and what is bad and what is genuine, we don't simply look at whether a set of acts conform to the current socio-technological condition, but what is true and meaningful, and that's the whole point of doing philosophy. If I regarded you as a random normie and a random brainlet I will not have used those "big words". Now since I thought you were someone who can actually reason into the core of a problem, I tried to get into the bottom - while not actually THE bottom - by touching things that has soemthing to do with world-process and genuine religion. By genuine religion what is meant is an utter repsect of the meaning of life as it is, rather than by pursuing a so-called tradition revive a certain sort of lifestyle or form of life that people somehow instinctively think is better. Of course the premise for making these statements regarding religion is that your religion is western and is "tainted" by the Abrahamic element - while some will say it is "gnostic", so that human agency and what you do matters, so that you're an actor in a cosmos that is a process with a dynamic order and genuine future, and is to be completed at the end of time, rather than a constituent of a natural order that is eternal.
    If you're simply someone who is interested in the socio-economic aspect of religion/culture, then good, it is OK to say that "people don't live like that anymore".

     No.268

    >>267
    BTW.. I don't care whether a thought current is true to its origin, and while the Renaissance is certainly not true to its origin, it is not fake with respect to both the societal and the spiritual change that was taking place. It was an age during which the scholastic tradition has reached its pinnacle and is in a state of stagnation, and while in my own opinion the Renaissance was largely a mistake and should be seen through the lense of the provencal religious current that encompasses Waldensian and Albigensian heresies, it was at least not fake spiritually. Also I'm not really sure whether you really have any true knowledge of the writings of, say, Pico della Mirandolla and Ficino, I think it is self-contradictory to love the so-called tradition and the Renaissance since the latter is in its essence "modern", and the occult elements and magical thinkings presented there were so common in that period so that it is hard to say that they are characteristically Renaissance. Fludd, Ficino, Agrippa, these people were really just surfacing during a period when the scholastic "rationalism" was in decline, and not that curiosly rationalism is in conlict with, say, modern "scientific" materialism; after all Boyle left a volume of recipes for home remedies that looks just like witchcraft (culled from an oak at the full moon, mistletoe berries dried, powered and mixed with black cherry water, will cure epilepsy" etc.) for modern minds. Some aspects of the occult are genuine philosophy, but most of them were no different from love potion recepies, or whether eating the genitals of a certain animal will improve one's this and that… It is decisively not "traditonal" when this tradition is something that is different from crude shamanism and is something that the vibe of Kyoto will remind people of. Shamanism, now some may think it is cool, while they abhor those performances given by actual shamans in, say, Manchu, in which people dance in front of the head of a slaughtered pig with cashes in its mouth…

     No.269

    >>265
    >is sufficient
    >is just bloat
    >thank you for
    Honestly I felt a strong sense of melancholy and despair, it's very existentialistic. The notion of "de-bloat" that Luke Smith likes to use seems to me to explain only part of technological life.
    For me a life that always concerns about the purity of technologies or purity in general is not even worth pursuing since that is already there to some extent. We already know the answer for this kind of practical things.

     No.270

    >>269
    Luke doesn't really reason. He has many opinions but there's a basic lack of "philosophy", in that his positions are self-contradictory. He wants independence, but his independence is built upon a general dependence, and moreover a sham. It doesn't mean that his opponents are correct. Both of them simply don't want to think about, say, the point of doing some stuff. They already have the conclusion, or they don't even comprehend the fact that the point of doing something actually matters, and is something that should be pondered upon and examined. I've observed that many who idolize the orthodox church has this attitude. It is like they try to find a secure point of view that is immune from all criticism, since they can accuse those who criticize the orthodox church as progressivist who don't understand the serene beauty of the ancient way and are brainwashed by modern capitalism etc. etc.
    The problem is not with purity itself but a false sense of purity. I'll say that this is actually apple-product mindset. So you have a false appearance that looks pure, then what you're doing must be pure, which is plainly false. Luck Smith idolizes the orthodox church and says the catholic church likes to add dogmas which he doesn't like, as if not adding any dogmas is the right and pure and TRADITIONAL thing to do, while the so-called tradition is itself a result of ages of conflict and transformation, and what is really "traditional" is, in contrast to the so-called tradition that the protestant or orthodox resistance to the apostolic constitution Munificentissimus Deus relies upon,
    >there was a deep longing in the masses for an intercessor and mediatrix who would at last take her place alongside the Holy Trinity and be received as the “Queen of Heaven and Bride at the heavenly court.” For more than a thousand years it had been taken for granted that the Mother of God dwelt there […]
    People invent tradition and "purity" without ever trying to dig deeper into their concept of purity and how they are shaped. They think the past or the tradition or whatever is an static entity that doesn't depend on the perspective one takes to comprehend the general shape of it. Moreover, they don't try to put themselves into the shoes of those who lived and thought in the past. This I'll say is due to a general lack of historical consciousness, and Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


    File: 1751301652390.png (18.3 KB, 560x95,tup.png)

     No.312[Reply]

    Theosophical University Press (TUP) makes their publications open access:
    - https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/ts/tup.htm
    - https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/ts/tup-onl.htm
    - https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/ts/tup-ebooks.htm
    And there're some very high quality pdfs available.

     No.310[Reply]

    Rudolf Steiner - the ultimate philosopher
    Deleuze+Smullyan - the ultimate professor-philosophers
    Novalis - the ultimate scientist-poet
    Goethe+Tolkien - the ultimate writer-poet
    Aleister Crowley+William Blake - the ultimate artists
    Mozart - the ultimate artist-composer
    Beethoven - the ultimate poet-composer
    Xenakis - the ultimate philosopher-composer
    Sclesi+Scherchen - the ultimate acousticians
    Steiner+Goethe - the ultimate pedagologists
    Novalis+Goethe - the ultimate mystics
    Novalis+Mozart+Goethe - the ultimate musician
    Haydn - the ultimate church-composer
    Josquin+Grisey - the ultimate acoustician-composers (spectralists)
    Hoelderlin+Nietzsche - the ultimate hermitic doomers
    Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

     No.309[Reply]

    1. Normie anthroposophy, "spirituality", astrology users (only read Steiner, Swedenborg etc.). The dumbest. They will upload very ugly, disorganized pdfs to libgen.is which are directly exported from epub (with the Times typeface). Because they don't have knowledge about modern computers, and are completely unaware of aesthetics, functionalities etc.. It's a true torture when I accidentally downloaded these pdfs.
    2.1 Normie right-wing users. The same as what described above.
    2.2 Elite right-wing users. Some of them are really good at typesetting beautiful pdfs, highly aware of and responsible for what they have made. And there're also many ardent publishers. The one with the most decent aesthetics (and know what real efficiency is) is Pax Aryna. These users usually have acquainted with mysticism, Jung etc. Know how to spread pdfs on the archive.org. But there're also large number of meaningless pdfs produced by certain publishers. I guess they're just very crazy and eager to spread some works…
    2.3 Left-wing / devoted marxism users. I don't know their behaviours on processing pdfs. Their marxists.org is a good html source.
    2.4 Anarchism users. THE typesetter archetype. Very good at producing decent (and color-less) in-print booklets/brochures (Tiqqun etc.) They have many well-organized multi-formatted text libraries: theanarchistlibrary.org, so common sources are already shared in all-formatted forms (absolutely open-source), refined flyers and brochures uploaded to libgen.is. Lack of perception on colors, obviously don't "know" art or music.
    Best functionality & lowest artisian. Seems like nihilism, objectivism. They destroyed individuality in typesetting activities and pushed efficiency to the extreme…
    3. Computer science users. They can't live without markdown, so they put all "books" on github pages etc… and they seem only read text books, very highbrow to them. They appreciate beautiful LaTeX pdfs, but too lazy to make artistic, personalized pdfs themselves. They're consumers [*].
    4. Logic / mathematics users. The most decent and witty. Sometimes they attach very useful tocs inside pdfs. They like djvu format from which you can't copy anything. Also, I can't stand a default LaTeX pdf (with very large page paddings).
    5. French philosophy or literature users arePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

     No.198[Reply]

    My mind types poem verses for me as long as when I feel pain. So the even weirder thing is that when I'm in a beautiful natural environment (such as when traveling in Europe), my brain is generally blank. Even when I tried to consider the corresponding verses, I had no clue at all.

    If read more Jung, he gives hints that made me think Why. Why I am not able to feel the nature through the language of poetry. I've been always suspect that this will be the very Why that I cannot write decent poems.

     No.306

    share one poem?

     No.308

    >>306
    There's a category called 'poem' on the main site.


    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
    | Catalog